Misunderstanding the command terms test, verify, and justify is a common issue in the MYP Mathematics eAssessment, particularly in Criterion B: Investigating Patterns. These terms are often used interchangeably by students, which leads to incomplete reasoning and loss of marks in a section that typically accounts for a significant portion of the assessment. Drawing on experience as an eAssessment examiner, this session clarifies the distinct expectations behind these command terms and highlights common misconceptions observed in student responses. Participants will explore practical examples of generalizing patterns and simple strategies to help students move from identifying patterns to effectively testing, verifying, and justifying their conclusions. The session aims to equip teachers with clearer interpretations of the assessment rubric and practical approaches to help students maximize success in the Investigating Patterns strand.
Outcomes: This professional development session will strengthen teachers’ understanding of the command terms test, verify, and justify within Criterion B: Investigating Patterns in the MYP Mathematics eAssessment. By clarifying the distinct expectations behind these terms and sharing insights from examiner experience, the session will help teachers address common misconceptions that often prevent students from accessing full marks. As a result, teachers will be better equipped to guide students in moving beyond simple pattern recognition toward clear mathematical reasoning and justification. Ultimately, this will improve the quality of student responses, increase confidence in approaching pattern investigation tasks, and support stronger performance in a component of the assessment that carries significant weight.This professional development session will strengthen teachers’ understanding of the command terms test, verify, and justify within Criterion B: Investigating Patterns in the MYP Mathematics eAssessment. By clarifying the distinct expectations behind these terms and sharing insights from examiner experience, the session will help teachers address common misconceptions that often prevent students from accessing full marks. As a result, teachers will be better equipped to guide students in moving beyond simple pattern recognition toward clear mathematical reasoning and justification. Ultimately, this will improve the quality of student responses, increase confidence in approaching pattern investigation tasks, and support stronger performance in a component of the assessment that carries significant weight.
